Engineering Education
Structured Problem Solving
This course develops a systematic approach to investigating and resolving engineering and manufacturing problems. It begins with the common logic shared by structured problem-solving methods, then focuses more deeply on 8D and DMAIC, the tools used during each stage of an investigation, and their application to actual engineering problems.
Core Topics
- Common structured problem-solving approaches
- 8D problem solving
- DMAIC methodology
- Problem definition, containment, and investigation
- Root cause analysis and verification
- Corrective action, implementation, control, and follow-up
Detailed Course Outline
-
Structured Problem Solving in Engineering
- Relationship between engineering design and structured problem solving
- Investigating problems in design, manufacturing, and field operation
- Interactions among design, materials, tooling, equipment, process, and environment
- Replacing trial-and-error troubleshooting with structured investigation
- Using objective data to guide decisions
- Distinguishing symptoms from root causes
- Developing corrective actions that prevent recurrence
-
Generic Problem-Solving Sequence
- Identify — select the problem to be worked on
- Define — develop the problem statement and investigation scope
- Problem Investigation / Measure — understand and quantify the problem
- Cause / Analyze — identify and verify root cause
- Solution / Improve — develop and verify permanent corrective actions
- Implementation / Improve — put permanent corrective action in place
- Review / Control — measure results and determine next actions
- Follow-Up — document results, standardize improvements, and identify future actions
-
Deming Cycle
- Plan
- Do
- Check
- Act
- Using the cycle for continuous improvement
- Holding gains and learning from results
-
Kepner-Tregoe Problem Analysis
- Define the problem
- Describe the problem
- Establish possible causes
- Test the most probable cause
- Verify the true cause
- Implement corrective action
- Using disciplined cause evaluation rather than assumption
-
7-Step Problem-Solving Process
- Project theme selection
- Customer and success measures
- Grasping the present status
- Process mapping and Pareto analysis
- Root cause analysis
- Corrective action
- Checking the effects
- Standardization and control
- Conclusions, savings, and future plans
-
8D Problem Solving
- D1 — Form the cross-functional team
- D2 — Describe and quantify the problem
- D3 — Establish containment and temporary corrective action
- D4 — Identify and verify root cause
- D5 — Formulate and verify permanent corrective actions
- D6 — Implement corrective action and confirm its effects
- D7 — Prevent recurrence and distribute lessons learned
- D8 — Recognize the team and close the investigation
- Using the 8D form to structure and document the investigation
- Application of 8D to actual manufacturing problems
-
DMAIC Problem-Solving Methodology
- Define — customers, project boundaries, problem, and process to improve
- Measure — determine current process performance, defects, and metrics
- Analyze — determine root causes and opportunities for improvement
- Improve — develop and verify solutions
- Control — prevent recurrence and establish ongoing controls
- Relationship between DMAIC and the generic problem-solving sequence
- Relationship between DMAIC and 8D
- Using DMAIC as a structured engineering project
- Management review and project gate considerations
-
Defining the Problem and Investigation
- Developing a clear and measurable problem statement
- Defining what is occurring, where, when, and under what conditions
- Quantifying occurrences using objective data
- Defining project scope
- Defining what is outside the project scope
- Business case
- Project objectives
- Goals and success measures
- Expected deliverables
- Project schedule and milestones
- Team roles and required resources
- DMAIC project charter
- 8D problem description and team definition
-
Is / Is-Not Analysis
- Using Is / Is-Not to sharpen the problem definition
- Identifying what exhibits the problem and what does not
- Comparing good and bad assemblies or processes
- Identifying what changed
- Using contrasts to narrow the investigation
-
Containment and Temporary Corrective Action
- Protecting the customer before permanent root cause is known
- Improving detection of defects
- Quarantining suspect material
- Stopping production when necessary
- Using temporary corrective action while permanent solutions are developed
- Measuring containment effectiveness
- Recognizing the expected effects of successful containment on scrap and rework
-
Problem Investigation and Measurement
- Reviewing warranty history
- Reviewing scrap and rework data
- Reviewing manufacturing efficiency
- Breaking high-level data into specific failure modes
- Verifying data accuracy before drawing conclusions
- Pareto analysis
- Failure data by date, shift, product, or process condition
- Developing timelines of failures
- Developing timelines of design, material, process, tooling, equipment, and repair changes
- Process mapping
- Mapping defect locations through the manufacturing process
- Identifying knowns and unknowns
-
Root Cause Identification
- Identifying potential causes
- Selecting key causes for further investigation
- Determining measurements needed to verify suspected causes
- Designing experiments to verify causes
- Separating occurrence from detection
- 5 Why analysis
- Working from the observed failure down toward the root cause or physical failure mechanism
- Cause-and-effect / fishbone diagrams
- Thought-process maps
- Reviewing DFMEA and PFMEA
- Examining design, material, tooling, equipment, process, and environmental contributors
- Connecting observed defects to stresses and failure mechanisms
-
Process Capability and Variation
- Using process data to evaluate suspected causes
- Process capability
- Cp and Cpk
- Short-term and long-term process capability
- Process centering
- Relationship between process capability and defect rates
- Sigma level and expected fallout
- Process shift and drift
- Comparing previous and current process performance
- Using capability data to distinguish equipment, process, and dimensional causes
-
Structured Problem-Solving Tools
- DFMEA and Design-for-Failure / Physics-of-Failure analysis
- PFMEA
- Design of Experiments
- Cause-and-effect / fishbone diagrams
- Brainstorming
- Pareto charts
- Maintenance history
- Check sheets
- Scatter charts
- Bar charts and histograms
- Timeline analysis
- Control charts
- X-bar and R charts
- Run charts
- Capability studies
- APQP checklists
- Control plans
- Gage R&R
- Process flow maps
- Is / Is-Not matrix
- 5 Whys
- Thought-process maps
- Selecting tools according to the problem rather than treating the methodology as a cookbook
-
Developing Permanent Corrective Actions
- Identifying multiple possible solutions
- Selecting solutions for further evaluation
- Evaluating feasibility, cost, and benefit
- Checking related processes for unintended effects
- Designing experiments to verify proposed solutions
- Testing solutions using previously defined success measures
- Reducing occurrence of the defect
- Improving detection where elimination of occurrence is not yet possible
- Applying design, tooling, equipment, process, and assembly changes as appropriate
-
Solution Verification
- Verifying the performance of the selected solution path
- Production-intent pilot verification
- Confirming that the corrective action addresses the identified root cause
- Confirming that the solution does not create new problems elsewhere
- Comparing post-improvement performance with original measurements
-
Implementation
- Obtaining authority to implement the permanent corrective action
- Training affected personnel
- Updating engineering and manufacturing documentation
- Confirming the change is implemented as intended
- Measuring actual improvement after implementation
- Monitoring related processes for unintended consequences
-
Documentation and Control
- Updating PFMEA
- Updating DFMEA
- Updating control plans
- Updating drawings and specifications
- Developing or revising standard operating procedures
- Operator and process training
- Establishing ongoing detection and monitoring methods
- Preventing recurrence through documented controls
-
Review, Follow-Up, and Sustaining the Improvement
- Reviewing results against project goals
- Determining why expected improvements did or did not occur
- Returning to earlier investigation stages when necessary
- Standardizing successful solutions
- Tracking scrap, rework, warranty, and other performance measures
- Monitoring improvement effectiveness over time
- Driving lessons learned across other products, processes, and production lines
- Documenting the completed investigation
- Identifying additional improvement opportunities
- Closing the project
-
Worked Engineering Problem-Solving Example
- Defining an actual field-performance problem
- Developing the project charter and scope
- Containment and improved end-of-line detection
- Reviewing warranty and manufacturing data
- Pareto analysis of failure modes
- Timeline analysis
- Process mapping
- Verifying data accuracy
- Root cause investigation
- Process capability analysis
- Identifying failure locations and mechanisms
- Developing corrective actions for multiple root causes
- Verifying solution performance
- Implementing detection and occurrence improvements
- Updating FMEAs, control plans, drawings, training, and procedures
- Tracking improvement effectiveness after implementation